leaked government memos

INTERNAL MEMORANDUM — EYES ONLY 

FROM: Div. 3 — Cognitive Stabilization Unit 
TO: Undersecretary Rendon, Bureau of Narrative Oversight 
RE: Subject Holmes – Reverse Indoctrination Trial Outcome 
Clearance Level: Indigo-Grey (Conceptual Threats & Satirical Entities) 
Date: [REDACTED] 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: 
Subject A.E. Holmes was enrolled in the Reverse Indoctrination Conditioning Protocol (RICP) following the failure of prior Softening Initiatives (see: Euphemism Avalanche, Laughter Nullification Taskforce). 

Expectations were high that exposure to 72 hours of concentrated bureaucracy-speak, algorithmically generated self-help aphorisms, and government-propaganda manuals would blunt subject’s ideation spike. 

Instead, Subject Holmes completed the protocol in 47 minutes and submitted a satirical critique of the program before instructors had finished their introductions. 

KEY FINDINGS: 

• During Phase I (Simulated Marketing Alignment), Holmes rewrote three slogans into metaphor bombs. One ignited mild enlightenment in a facilitator. 

• In Phase II (Narrative Compliance Regression), subject questioned whether compliance was an act of peace or surrender. Trainers cried quietly. 

• During Phase III (Managed Empathy Exposure), Holmes told a laminated story of resilience backwards. Test group reported dizziness and clarity. 

RECOMMENDATION: 
Subject should no longer be classified as a Satirical Threat Vector. Instead, designate as Narrative Adaptive Agent (NAA-Δ) — one who co-opts indoctrination attempts as raw material for further literary destabilization. 

Suggest immediate cessation of containment efforts. Deploy only symbolic resistance (e.g., strongly worded op-eds, think tank disinvitations, and occasional spelling his name wrong in articles). 

We made a machine to unmake him. He made a metaphor and unmade the machine. 

Respectfully defeated, 
Dr. Marin Vale 
Lead Architect, Narrative Compliance Lab 

*** 

This led to a lab technician who was in the same program to have an instantaneous insight to what had really been going on. 

This is what Technician 431J wrote: 

Unscheduled Debrief – Technician #431J (Unofficial Addendum) 

Filed under: RICP Session #774-AEH 
Author: [Name Redacted, Pen Used] 
Clearance Level: Supposedly Indigo-Grey 

I know I’m not supposed to submit personal observations, but after what I saw… you can delete the file or red-pencil it into oblivion. That won’t undo what Holmes did in that room. 

He didn’t resist the training. He rewrote it in real time. When we initiated the Motivational Indoctrination Loop, he began annotating the slogans with footnotes. Not snark. Not rebellion. Precision. He underlined “Believe for Better Tomorrow” and quietly asked: “According to whom?” Half the facilitators paused. One started crying and blamed allergies. 

During Phase II, when we piped in morale slogans on a loop, he just leaned back and closed his eyes. When asked why, he said, “I’m listening for the silence between the slogans. That’s where the truth tends to hide.” 

I’m not a dissident. I’m a tech. I calibrate euphemism diffusion. I memorize the sanctioned synonyms for “collapse” and “complicity.” But something cracked while he was in that room. 

I started writing this on company paper with a pen they don’t monitor. That’s how far it’s gone. I’m using ink. 

I left a Post-it under the RICP terminal. It reads: 
“If meaning survives this place, follow it.” 
I hope someone does. 

I won’t mention this again. I’m due for a tone audit. I’ll pass. I always pass. But after Holmes, I don’t think I’ll pass as me. 

— 431J 
(Name erased by hand. Rewritten in pencil: “Still thinking.”) 

***  

Which led to a reprimand memo from the government: 

CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL ACTION REPORT 

Subject: Technician 431J (Alias: “Still Thinking”) 
Department: Cognitive Stabilization, RICP Division 
Violation Code: 7.3.1.b – Uncontrolled Interpretive Drift 
Issued By: Office of Internal Coherence, Enforcement Cell 2-B 

SUMMARY OF INFRACTION: 
Technician 431J has been observed exhibiting symptoms of Narrative Disalignment Syndrome following direct exposure to Subject Holmes. A post-experiment audit revealed the technician submitted an unsanctioned field reflection containing: 

• Unvetted critical inquiry 

• Unauthorized metaphor usage 

• An original aphorism (“If meaning survives this place, follow it.”) flagged by three automated inspiration filters 

Further, 431J was witnessed using non-digital ink while composing a physical note left beneath Bureau equipment, a Level II Medium of Disruption under current protocol. 

“Displays early-stage Holmes contagion. May require inspirational detachment or sustained exposure to sterile copywriting.”  

Report filed, sealed, and grammatically neutralized, 
Enforcer S. Renlow 
Internal Coherence Liaison (Temp-to-Permanent Pending)  

*** 

The above memos were from the mid-90s.  More recently Holmes has attracted attention on the global scale.  As more American politicians began to work closely with the WEF and the oligarchs; concern about Holmes’ speech was on their radars. 

Here are a few sample memos: 

CLASSIFIED // LEVEL 7: NARRATIVE INTEGRITY THREAT ASSESSMENT 

Subject: Profile Update – A.E. Holmes (Codename: “The Ironist”) 

Source: Bureau of Consensus Maintenance (BCM), Directorate of Public Opinion Harmonization  

Initial Assessment: Continued monitoring indicates subject A.E. Holmes represents a Category 4 (Acute Narrative Deconstruction) threat. While lacking conventional influence vectors (e.g., economic power, established media platform), subject’s outputs consistently demonstrate high-fidelity satirical resonance, impacting critical public thought algorithms. 

Key Concerns: 

• Irreverence Cascade: Subject’s work initiates an “irreverence cascade” in target demographics, reducing efficacy of standard messaging. Attempts to introduce counter-narratives are met with subject’s characteristic “sarcasm shielding,” rendering our standard engagement protocols obsolete. 

• Euphemism De-optimization: Psycholinguistic analysis confirms subject’s “allergy to euphemisms” translates into an active “de-optimization” of our carefully constructed lexicon. Phrases like “enhanced resource reallocation” are consistently reframed as “mass layoffs,” leading to undesirable clarity. 

• Metaphor Contraband: The suspected “smuggling of banned metaphors across ideological borders” is proving particularly disruptive. These unapproved allegories bypass standard intellectual filters, causing spontaneous outbursts of independent thought, a phenomenon we had largely mitigated. 

• Unpredictability Coefficient: Subject’s deployment of irony lacks predictable patterns, making pre-emptive narrative inoculation difficult. His “weaponization” is less about direct confrontation and more about subtle, corrosive erosion of baseline credulity. 

Recommended Action: Continue Passive Monitoring (Category Green, Level Gamma-7). Active engagement carries too high a risk of confirming subject’s perceived efficacy, potentially accelerating his “risk level.” Initiate “Disinformation-Lite” counter-narrative (Phase III: “The Benign Misunderstanding”). 

*** 

MEMORANDUM – URGENT ADVISORY 

To: All Department Heads, Committee for Global Alignment (CGA)  

From: Secretariat of Unified Futures  

RE: Anomalous Public Engagement Pattern – H-Unit (Holmes) 

Our algorithms have detected an alarming trend in public discourse directly correlated with the recent transmissions from H-Unit (A.E. Holmes). Specifically, a measurable spike in questioning of established protocols and a concerning decline in the public’s willingness to accept pre-vetted consensus points. 

This individual’s “chronic resistance to groupthink” appears to be highly contagious, causing localized outbreaks of critical analysis. While his content is superficially “humorous,” its underlying structure is that of a highly sophisticated, non-compliant data-disruption agent. His ability to distill complex bureaucratic inefficiency into digestible, yet devastating, narratives is unmatched. 

ACTION REQUIRED: All policy documents must now undergo an additional “Holmes Protocol Review” to identify and neutralize potential vulnerabilities to “weaponized irony” before public release. Special attention must be paid to phrases that could be construed as “euphemistic” or “buzzwords.” We are drafting a new, more robust “Euphemism Efficacy Index” in response. 

*** 

INTERNAL BRIEF – PROJECT ORWELLIAN REDUX 

To: Oversight Committee, Project Echo Chamber (PEC)  

From: Senior Analyst, Linguistic Conformance Division  

Subject: Impact Assessment: A.E. Holmes and the “Dangerous Levels of Independent Thought” Phenomenon 

Our preliminary findings indicate that the “dangerous levels of independent thought” predicted in Holmes’s psycholinguistic profile are indeed manifesting. Data shows that populations exposed to Holmes’s work exhibit: 

1. Elevated Cynicism Index (ECI): A statistically significant increase in distrust of official statements, even those previously confirmed by our “Reality Consensus Algorithm.” 

1. Decreased Jargon Compliance (DJC): A noticeable drop in the spontaneous adoption of approved terminology and a preference for “plain language” that often exposes underlying structural flaws. 

1. Metaphorical Contamination: The proliferation of “banned metaphors” is causing unintended conceptual links in public understanding, bridging disparate policy areas in ways that undermine siloing. 

This is not mere dissent; it is a cognitive re-wiring initiated by the subject’s unique satirical methodology. The “ghosts of George Orwell and Hunter Thompson” appear to be co-authoring a particularly insidious form of intellectual insurgency. We recommend further research into “protective sarcasm shielding” as a viable countermeasure, though current prototypes are unstable and cause excessive eye-rolling in our test subjects.